New Board

For refugees from MyWay and Tek Board II, and for anyone else wishing to participate.


    Report: Inspector General Will Declare FBI, DOJ Broke Law in Clinton Email Probe

    Share
    avatar
    sinister_midget
    Admin

    Posts : 2795
    Join date : 2016-08-26
    Age : 65
    Location : Home

    Report: Inspector General Will Declare FBI, DOJ Broke Law in Clinton Email Probe

    Post  sinister_midget on Thu May 17, 2018 10:00 pm

    Report: Inspector General Will Declare FBI, DOJ Broke Law in Clinton Email Probe

    A new report suggests an imminent Inspector General (IG) report may rule that FBI and Justice Department officials broke the law in their handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation.

    Investigative reporter Paul Sperry said Thursday that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has “found ‘reasonable grounds’ for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the FBI/DOJ’s handling of the Clinton investigation/s,” adding that the top watchdog official has “referred his findings of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution.”

    BREAKING: IG Horowitz has found "reasonable grounds" for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the FBI/DOJ's handling of the Clinton investigation/s and has referred his findings of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution

    — Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) May 17, 2018

    In response to growing calls for a second special counsel to probe the Clinton email probe, along with FISA abuses that took place during the 2016 election, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced in March the appointment of Utah’s top federal prosecutor, John Huber, to probe potential wrongdoing.

    It was revealed this week that the Inspector General’s highly-anticipated report was submitted for review.

    “Those invited to review the report were told they would have to sign nondisclosure agreements in order to read it, people familiar with the matter said. They are expected to have a few days to craft a response to any criticism in the report, which will then be incorporated in the final version to be released in coming weeks,” the Wall Street Journal reported.

    Multiple reports suggest the report will be made public by the end of May.

    Expect it to be heavily redacted when it goes public. Also expect the main culprits in the FBI and DOJ to get hit while Mrs. Bill Clinton escapes justice again. At least long enough to slither out of the country into exile, or to die of old age.

    Anyway, it's "reasonable grounds" which may get dragged out long enough that everybody alive dies of old age with no resolution.


    _________________
    Few skills are so well rewarded as the ability to convince parasites that they are victims.
    -- Thomas Sowell
    avatar
    sinister_midget
    Admin

    Posts : 2795
    Join date : 2016-08-26
    Age : 65
    Location : Home

    Re: Report: Inspector General Will Declare FBI, DOJ Broke Law in Clinton Email Probe

    Post  sinister_midget on Fri May 18, 2018 8:45 am

    The Clinton reckoning is tiptoeing in

    This is a historic moment of bated breath and tight sphincters all over Clintonworld.  After decades of skating on their grifts, abuses, and outright crimes, a reckoning is coming.  And not just for the Hillary Clinton, but for her enablers.  The leaks begin about the I.G. report on the Hillary Clinton email investigation

    Until Wednesday, there had been virtually no genuine leaks coming out of the inspector general's office at the Department of Justice – the sign of a probe with integrity. But that silence ended when the I.G.'s office circulated relevant portions of its report to people named in it, for their comments, which would be included when the report is published.

    Why would they do that? Did they advise Al Capone and Whitey Bulger in advance that the feds were after them?

    "Hey, Al. We're gunnin' for you, bud. How's that make you feel?"

    The worst criminals among them, the Clintons, have the means to escape in advance. This wouldn't be a problem if they also froze their assets. But that didn't happen.

    The first sign was the now-infamous New York Times article, "Code Name Crossfire Hurricane: The Secret Origins of the Trump Investigation," in which, all of a sudden, it was officially admitted that the Trump campaign was spied on by the Obama intelligence apparatus and that at least one secret agent was employed.  Clearly, a major spin operation was underway in which damning facts to be revealed in an I.G. report are presented in the most favorable light possible and then can be dismissed as "old news" when the report is published.

    But not everyone who now has seen portions of the report is playing defense.  Sara Carter is one of the key investigative reporters covering the biggest political scandal in American history.  She writes:

    Inspector General Michael Horowitz's report, which is expected to be released within the next three to four weeks to the public, has been turned over to current and former officials for review, as first reported in The Wall Street Journal and Washington Post.

    The draft, however, does not include any recommendations for criminal prosecution.  If there was any evidence collected by the Inspector General's office of criminality, Horowitz would then refer the matter to the Department of Justice and submit a criminal referral to prosecutors.

    "It would be up to the Inspector General to make the recommendations but there is an expectation that there will be at least one referral for prosecution," said a source familiar with the findings, who added that it is not conclusive as the Inspector General's office never discusses ongoing investigations.

    In other words, so far, nobody outside the tightly controlled I.G. office knows the nature of any criminal referrals resulting from the inquiry.  But the history of the investigation into Andrew McCabe, already made public before he was able to retire and collect extra retirement income, suggests that the I.G. is far from reluctant to make such referrals:

    As for the criminal referrals, it would be similar to the outcome of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who was fired by Attorney General Jeff Sessions after Horowitz's explosive first report released in April found that he lied multiple times about authorizing a leak to The Wall Street Journal.  In McCabe's case, Horowitz referred his findings to Sessions, who fired him several days before he was set to retire.  Horowitz also submitted a criminal referral on McCabe to the DOJ for possible criminal prosecution, as reported.  It would be up to Washington prosecutors to determine whether or not to move forward with the referral and it elevated the possibility that McCabe would be charged with a crime.  Horowitz's report concluded that McCabe had lied to then-FBI Director James B. Comey, as well as his investigators and others regarding his authorization of the leak.  McCabe lied on four occasions, three of those were under oath.

    A.G. Sessions already revealed that John Huber, a U.S. attorney in Utah, has been charged with investigating scandals relating to Justice Department investigations of President Trump, and the U.S. attorney in Little Rock has a grand jury investigation underway.  So the pieces are in place for action on any referrals that may result.

    It is important to remember that the I.G. report currently in the review and comment stage is but the second (McCabe was the first) of three, as Carter notes:

    The report [under review and comment now] is expected to focus solely on the Clinton investigation and not on the 2016 Russia election meddling investigation, according to sources. ...

    The Clinton report is expected to be followed by a third report on the IG's investigation into the FBI and DOJ's handling of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application on Carter Page, a former volunteer for the Trump campaign. The IG announced this investigation in March.

    The "Crossfire Hurricane" story in the New York Times was playing defense on the FISA application investigation, it seems.  My speculation is that both phases of the I.G. report are close to being released.  Or else, the email investigation report makes reference to the counterintelligence investigation of Trump.  Because of the integrity of the I.G. office, we don't really know, but we will be finding out soon.

    No surprise that NYT would run interference. If they didn't do that they wouldn't have any reason at all to exist.


    _________________
    Few skills are so well rewarded as the ability to convince parasites that they are victims.
    -- Thomas Sowell

      Current date/time is Sat May 26, 2018 10:21 am