New Board

For refugees from MyWay and Tek Board II, and for anyone else wishing to participate.


    If Evelyn Farkas Resigned in 2015, How Did She Have Access to Trump-Russian Intelligence?

    Share
    avatar
    sinister_midget
    Admin

    Posts : 2344
    Join date : 2016-08-26
    Age : 64
    Location : Home

    If Evelyn Farkas Resigned in 2015, How Did She Have Access to Trump-Russian Intelligence?

    Post  sinister_midget on Fri Mar 31, 2017 8:50 am

    If Evelyn Farkas Resigned in 2015, How Did She Have Access to Trump-Russian Intelligence?

    This was making waves yesterday, after Evelyn Farkas admitted to Mika from The Morning Joe show that she strongly advised people 'on the hill' and in our intelligence agencies to tuck away intelligence regarding Russo-Trump ties for the sake of preservation, in an effort to protect it from the onerous bureaucracy she obviously finds to be deplorable.

    "Get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration," said Farkas in an interview yesterday on MSNBC.

    She was afraid the Trump people would gain access to their intelligence and whisk it away -- because they're all Russian spies, obviously.

    Aside from what appears to be a brazen confirmation of spying on the Trump team, the bigger red flag here is Dr. Farkas wasn't employed by the Obama administration at the time the Russian allegations arose.

    According to Pentagon records, Dr. Farkas resigned in September of 2015.

    So how did this non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and former deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russia, Ukraine and Eurasia, gain knowledge of intelligence regarding members of Trump's team and their relations with Russia, when she was the senior foreign policy advisor for Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton?

    Farkas was the prime driver behind the anti-Russia phobia inside the Pentagon during the Obama years -- shilling hard for the Ukraine -- requesting that the President send them anti-tank missiles -- which, essentially, would mean outright war with Russia.

    Back to the interview with Mika Brzezinski. Dr. Farkas said 'we' had good intel on Russia. Who does she refer to when she says 'we?'

    Here's Mark Levin's take on this scandal.

    Perhaps someone inside the Obama government was leaking to the Hillary campaign?

    I think we all know what the answer is to the rhetorical question



    Her problem was she was in the midst of leftist fellow travelers and wanted to show how smart and important she is. She forgot she was in front of the camera, too. So she spilled the beans by accident when it became as comfortable to her as hanging out at a Washington cocktail party bragging about what an insider she is like all of the rest of the traitors like to do.

    She tried to walk it back the next day when she realized she didn't step in it, but dived in head first. Not only did her "clarification" sound ridiculous, but it still didn't solve how she knew it was happening.

    Time to bring her in for questioning (NOT by the FBI, it needs to be investigated properly), make her plead the Fifth a bunch of times, watch her squirm for several days on live TV, then offer to give her minimum time or outright immunity for some answers. If she's lucky after that she might not end up at Fort Marcy park with a hole in her head (at an angle that would be nearly impossible for someone to do to themselves) and a NYT editorial about how she'd been under a lot of pressure at home.


    _________________
    One of the most important reasons for studying history is that
    virtually every stupid idea that is in vogue today has been tried
    before and proved disastrous before, time and again.
    --  Thomas Sowell
    avatar
    sinister_midget
    Admin

    Posts : 2344
    Join date : 2016-08-26
    Age : 64
    Location : Home

    Re: If Evelyn Farkas Resigned in 2015, How Did She Have Access to Trump-Russian Intelligence?

    Post  sinister_midget on Fri Mar 31, 2017 9:00 am

    Obama Official Farkas Changes Story! Now Says: “I Had No Insider Info” to Dodge Felony Charges

    Former Asst. Defense Secretary, Evelyn Farkas is under heavy fire for her March 2nd appearance on MSNBC where she admitted to knowing that the Trump camp was being surveilled. She is trying to do some damage control so she appeared on CNBC’s Squawk Box to walk back her statements.

    Remember, Donald Trump didn’t tweet about Trump Tower being ‘wiretapped’ until March 4th. Farkas said in her March 2nd interview, (prior to Trump informing the public about the wiretapping claim) that she knew about intelligence being gathered on the Trump folks. Huh? How did she know if not for insider info…

    Today, in her interview with CNBC, she claimed she only knew what was already in the press. What?! There was nothing in the press about Trump being spied on until 2 days AFTER her appearance on MSNBC! Time to lawyer up, Farkas! The wagons are circling…

    Farkas: ”
    “We were having a transition of power from the Obama administration to the Trump administration. If indeed there was an investigation ongoing, if indeed there was information the Obama administration had about Russian interference and possible American involvement, I wanted to make sure Congress knew about it,” she said on “Squawk Box.”
    I was out of the government at the time all this came out into the press and I only knew what I read in the press, but KNOWING-uh HEARING that our intelligence community was looking into this, investigating into what had happened. Understanding the relationship between Wikileaks and the Russian government I could kinda read between the lines and I became very concerned even without having any inside information.”

    The Democrats’ hubris is the gift that keeps giving. If Farkas had any common sense, she would never have made this appearance on CNBC. She should have retained an attorney immediately and SHUT UP. The more she blabs on about what she knew, the more she is incriminating herself. Just look at how nervous she was in this interview compared to her last one…





    And of course she was trying to do some damage control on her Twitter account claiming she ‘didn’t give anybody anything except advice re Russia’. We want to know how you had access to this intelligence being that you were no longer in your government position, Farkas. Grab the popcorn!


    _________________
    One of the most important reasons for studying history is that
    virtually every stupid idea that is in vogue today has been tried
    before and proved disastrous before, time and again.
    --  Thomas Sowell

      Current date/time is Sun Dec 17, 2017 9:56 am